made with
google translate
sorry for the mistakes
Capriccio Veneziano
Are there more tourists who frequent it, or films about morbid sex stories set “in a sad and glossy Venice”?
I believe it’s the latter. And Bruno Mattei didn’t miss the
chance to weigh in with his own take, creating a direct-to-video film
in 2002, right in the midst of his erotic phase.
As already mentioned, we find ourselves in a sad and glossy Venice,
where the painter Lorenzo (Gualberto Parmeggiani) happens to meet
Roberta (Emily Crawford, with Mattei also in Belle da Morire), a music
teacher—a must for anyone starting a morbid sex story in the
lagoon city. The two, of course, begin a heated (I should say morbid,
but I’ve already said it several times, and I think it’s
clear) relationship, with Lorenzo preferring the teacher over his
wife/girlfriend, Anna, played by Ksenija Trbovich, who we’ll see
in slightly more significant films.
It’s a matter of taste, but I can’t explain that choice.
Just as I can’t understand the point of a film where Mattei
“draws inspiration” from Eyes Wide Shut and Nine and a Half
Weeks and makes a discount version of them. To put it mildly.
In any case, after 20 minutes of the film, Lorenzo and Roberta are
already having sex. Then she hands her boyfriend over to her dear
friend Luisa (Juliana Jerrugan), without any impact on the plot, and
has fun with her new friend, fighting/screwing, screwing/fighting, with
him and some of her friends.
Emily Crawford, by the way, spends the entire film with a disgusted
expression, perhaps because she’s stuck with a painter who,
rather than a Venetian bohemian, seems more like an unemployed house
painter (no offense to the profession, but it’s to convey the
idea).
Dear Bruno Mattei reaches one of the lowest points of his filmography,
even forgetting that he’s usually capable of making do with the
little he has at hand.
In Capriccio Veneziano, nothing works. A long parade of poverty of
resources, terrible direction, nonexistent acting, and inexplicable
choices. Among the many, it’s worth mentioning the absurd scene
with a chroma key that’s supposed to show us Venice through a
window.
Then there are also some extras, perhaps unaware they’re ending
up in a film, who look directly into the camera, scenes of Venice taken
from someone else’s stock footage, and the one where the
protagonist, dressed as a man, almost gets into a fight with the
gondoliers.
Let’s just say that if it had been a porno and not softcore, it
would have had some dignity. Instead, we’re stuck with a
restrained film accompanied by omnipresent music, sometimes famous,
which I won’t name so as not to associate it with a movie that
makes you sad. And not because of sad and glossy Venice.